Home

Advertisement

Customize
honu, cheryl, Cartoon

Are suburbs becoming obsolete?

As a planner dealing with open space, land conservation and outdoor recreation and trails, the subject of land use planning, how cities and their suburbs are developed are increasingly on my mind. You hear more and more of trying to be carbon-neutral. The basic issue is sustainability, which is not even a passing thought for most Americans. The following article echoes some of my concerns and brings up the 100-mile rule (your daily needs, especially all foods, come from within a 100 mile radius)--a good quick read on the subject. . . .
http://www.crosscut.com/mossback/16796/

Comments

I haven't read the article yet, so I'll only speak to your overview.

We have two kinds of suburbs here in Albuquerque--farmland that has been rezoned residential and houses up on the mesa.

The rezoned farmland only needs the proper economic motivation to become productive again. Probably in the form of something like victory gardens.

The mesa, on the other hand, is marginal land, even for grazing animals. It is hard to think of any economic use for the land *other* than building houses on it. Those are the places I most worry about as gas continues to get more expensive.

Albuquerque, I assume like many other areas, has been experiencing a rebuilding of the city center. We have all sorts of infill construction and investment in commercial and residential spaces inside the city.

Nothing on the scale to affect any sort of migration from the mesa into the valley. Also as is extremely typical, most of our major politicians own land around the city, and infrastructure to nowhere gets approved at what would be an astonishing rate were it not so typical.

I was concerned, myself, in thinking that I was moving to the suburbs to live at sunflower river. Certainly we're quite a ways out of town, but it only feels that way when you're talking about biking or walking. The scale of the whole thing doesn't feel the same as Phoenix or Denver.
My main experience (and frustrations) are with Phoenix and Tucson and the rampant growth without any vision or thought of the future or even of livability for the current inhabitants. The few farmer's markets we have are packed and sell out of veggies and fruits early in the day, so the demand is there.

Most American towns were settled before national and international transportation was readily available, so the surrounding area was capable of providing the necessary potable water, foodstuffs and raw materials (or the town did not succeed). Now towns are so big, they are consuming the available agricultural lands for residential and commercial development. Where do people think their foods will come from? Truck it, fly it, ship it from far away may soon become too expensive.

The article I referenced talks of the need for existing small communities to reestablish the small farms, and pedestrian and bike paths to make the communities liveable and sustainable in the coming decades as fuel becomes scarce and prohibitively expensive, i.e., more sunflower rivers. visionary? realistic? yes to both.
honu, cheryl, Cartoon

August 2008

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      
Powered by LiveJournal.com

Advertisement

Customize